English and Welsh by J.R.R. Tolkien

Author:J.R.R. Tolkien [Tolkien, J.R.R.]
Language: eng
Format: epub, pdf
Published: 0100-12-31T16:00:00+00:00

12

'honours' in the School of English.

But in early times there was no such confusion. The Brettas and the Walas were the same.

The use of the latter term, which| was applied by the English, is thus of considerable

importance in estimating the linguistic situation of the early period.

It seems clear that the word walh, wealh which the English brought with them was a

common Germanic name for a man of what we should call Celtic speech. 17 But in all the recorded Germanic languages in which it appears it was also applied to the speakers of Latin.

That may be due, as is usually assumed, to the fact that Latin eventually occupied most of the

areas of Celtic speech within the knowledge of Germanic peoples. But it is, I think, also in

part a linguistic judgement, reflecting that very similarity in style of Latin and Gallo-Brittonic that I have already mentioned. It did not occur to anyone to call a Goth a walh even if he was long settled in Italy or in Gaul. Though 'foreigner' is often given as the first gloss on wealh in Anglo-Saxon dictionaries this is misleading. The word was not applied to foreigners of

Germanic speech, nor to those of alien tongues, Lapps, Finns, Esthonians, Lithuanians, Slavs,

or Huns, with whom the Germanic-speaking peoples came into contact in early times. (But

borrowed in Old Slavonic in the form ulachu it was applied to the Roumanians.) It was, therefore, basically a word of linguistic import; and in itself implied in its users more

linguistic curiosity and discrimination than the simple stupidity of the Greek barbaros.

Its special association by the English with the Britons was a product of their invasion of

Britain. It contained a linguistic judgement, but it did not discriminate between the speakers

of Latin and the speakers of British. But with the perishing of the spoken Latin of the island,

and the concentration of English interests in Britain, walh and its derivatives became

synonymous with Brett and brittisc, and in the event replaced them. 18

In the same way the use of wealh for slave is also due solely to the situation in Britain. But again the gloss 'slave' is probably misleading. Though the word slave itself shows that a national name can become generalized in this sense, I doubt if this was true of wealh. The Old English word for 'slave' in general remained theow, which was used of slaves in other

countries or of other origin. The use of wealh, apart from the legal status to which surviving elements of the conquered population were no doubt often reduced, must always have implied

recognition of British origin. Such elements, though incorporated in the domain of an English

or Saxon lord, must long have remained 'not English', and with this difference preservation in

a measure of their British speech may have endured longer than is supposed.

This is a controversial point, and I do not deal with the question of place-names, such as

Walton, Walcot, and Walworth, that may be supposed to contain this old word walh, 19 But the incorporation in the domains conquered

Download

Copyright Disclaimer:
This site does not store any files on its server. We only index and link to content provided by other sites. Please contact the content providers to delete copyright contents if any and email us, we'll remove relevant links or contents immediately.